From: "John Sukey", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still find it hard to believe that the wrath of the parents
was not directed at the chief constable who made it possible
for the murderer to get his guns. He is an accessory to the
murders as he knew full well the character of that bag of
filth. I find it still harder to believe that the law
protectects him. But then there are probably a lot of M.P.s
who are also masons. The legislation passed after dunblane
is a perversion of the law by pratts who made this possible
in the first place abetted by a press who hasn't a clue and
really don't want to know.
--
The masons had nothing to do with it.
However, you raise an interesting point, the parents were
all for suing CSP for their inept administration of the
licensing system, however the police did a better job
of deflecting them than we did, plus there were those
in the anti-gun lobby who thought that it played into
our hands to go after the police because that's what we
were doing. Guy Savage can give you a better rundown
on this as he was involved with it.
So the police got away scot-free, essentially, except
for the retirement of one officer, and 57,000 innocent
people were scapegoated.
Steve.
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
