From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Come on guys - you are being totally unfair on IG - he has simply not stated
> WHAT he has done about the dodgy 5%, and you are assuming he has done
> nothing - don't condemn a man with insufficient information - that's how
> Tony Bliar and Jack Boot Straw operate!!!!
OK, it's late and I can't be bothered to check out exact
numbers. But, lets think about it, how many FAC's are
there in the Country, a figure of 200, 000 could be
plucked out of the air. I don't know if it's right but I don't
think there are any less than that. If 5% of FAC holders
are not fit to hold said FAC's then that works out at
10,000 People. How many force areas are there, about
40? That means on average 240 people in every force
area are not fit to hold FAC's, if this is the case why isn't
IG doing something about it especially as he considers
them to be "potentially dangerous"?
If you extrapolate the figure of 5% to include SGC
holders(1.5-2M?), you have to conclude that there are
thousands of psychocho's running around every force
area, just waiting to perpetrate a massacre. If this is the
case then it makes you wonder what the bloody hell
people like IG are doing as far as administering the
Firearms Acts goes?
No, this figure of 5% is just pure rubbish and IG knows it,
he probably just chose it because it sounds catchy. If it
were correct I certainly wouldn't be associating with this
type of person and if it were right I would be getting rather
worried, and I'm not.
j.
--
It is plausible if you include all the people who are refused
a grant or had a certificate revoked but the reality is that
most of those are for technical reasons or health reasons
rather than because they are dodgy people, I reckon, but the
stats don't show that.
Steve.
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
