From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You just didn't listen did you? IG DID NOT SAY WHAT HE HAS OR HASN'T DONE
> about the so-called 5%, but you have seen fit to condemn him without knowing
> the full facts - THAT IS MY POINT!!!....and that is how those BASTARDS in
> power operate - congratulations, you are now a fully paid-up member of the
> plonkers society.
>
> Chris
But you are missing the main thrust of what I said. In the
paragraph you quoted it was the figure of 5% I was
questioning. I'm perfectly willing to accept that there may
be a number of dodgy FAC holders, and I do know of a
couple of very recent revocations, that im sure IG knows
of, that if what I hear is correct are definatley warranted. I
find a figure of 5% difficult to accept though as this
ammounts to a rather large number of people in every
force area.
Given my own experiance of FAC holders and the number
of dangerous or illegal acts that are perpetrated by them,
I would have to say that the figure of 5% is definatley an
gross over estimation.
Jonathan Laws.
--
In 1995 there were 172,150 FACs on issue and 740,200 SGCs
on issue in Great Britain.
There were 120 refusals to grant an FAC and 380 refusals to
grant a SGC. There were 110 refusals to renew an FAC and
140 refusals to renew a SGC. There were 230 revocations of
an FAC and 720 revocations of SGCs.
Someone do the math please.
Steve.
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
