From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<Please provide one example of a person on this list who has
said this person should be armed. Your straw man just
won't stand up.>>
Peter Jackson openly advocates total freedom of movement of firearms. That
is one.
Others seek the same end.
Total freedom of firearms means that people like this would be free to have
firearms.
Which part of this dont you understand?
OK. More laws mean more offenders, I know that. BUT, and its a very big
BUT.....take a look around you.
It is a sad but inescapable fact that the degree of responsibility and
common sense exercised by the average person is somewhat lacking.
Example 1.
Go to a football match. See the supporters, of all ages, leaping about and
hurling obscenities and threats at the referee and opposition. A non
football fan cannot go into some city centres on a match day for the
thousands of idiots that congregate and are intent on causing as much mayhem
as they can get away with. If you live in Newcastle and have a Sunderland
accent, there are some areas that you would not dare go to, as you WOULD be
violently assaulted. They are 15 miles apart. All to do with football. Loads
of common sense there.
Example 2.
Go into any city centre on a Friday or Saturday evening. Take a look around.
Need I say more?
Example 3.
Try travelling slower than 80mph in the outside lane of a motorway.
Need I go on?
IG
--
But surely the point is that even with all the controls, he still
had guns, so he would have still had guns either way, whether there
were controls or not? So what benefit did the controls provide?
Steve.
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
