On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote: >Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to >Earnie instead. Sorry about that... > >Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see, >http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any "Shell Utils" category. >What it does quite clearly state is, "Please do not invent a new category >without checking with the cygwin-apps mailing list first". Does that mean >that we should consider that to be a proposal for a new category? :)
As Chuck has pointed out, we are clearly not going to approve a category which is essentially a concatenation of two existing categories. And, it doesn't make sense to me to use this particular package for a departure from current practices. cgf
