On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >=== >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate >package. >> >> How about this: >> John, why don't you create a "bashutils" package, to serve as a >> collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings. For now, >> it could contain only bashcompletion, but later you could add -- oh, >> bashprompt, or something... > >Funnily enough, I suggested calling the package bashtools last night. >Hmmm, now why was that?
Doh. I missed this. I probably could have just agreed with this suggestion and saved myself some grief. I think that the concept makes sense regardless of the name. cgf
