> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
> 
> I want to suggest that the following become policy:
> 
> No new packages are accepted that require non-packaged prerequisites.
> 
> i.e. using rpm which was raised on cygwin@ recently,
> until db 3.2 is packaged and maintained by 'someone', rpm is not
> acceptable as a package.
> 
> Thoughts?

I don't know how things could work any other way, in cases such as this anyway.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot. 

Reply via email to