Robert Collins wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM > > > But if a cygwin > > native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it. > > IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the moment, with > the _single_ exception of postgresql, every package here can be rebuilt > from source, to a version equivalent to what the package maintainer > posted, on a cygwin system, with the tools that the distribution has. So > yes, UPX should be a package before it's used to make packages. > > I vote for including UPX... and Lapo makes two. Do we need a third? And > are there any objections? >
Does UPX come with an API library that you can just use in setup? Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
