Hallo Earnie, Am 2002-03-15 um 14:28 schriebst du:
> Robert Collins wrote: >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM >> >> > But if a cygwin >> > native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it. >> >> IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the moment, with >> the _single_ exception of postgresql, every package here can be rebuilt >> from source, to a version equivalent to what the package maintainer >> posted, on a cygwin system, with the tools that the distribution has. So >> yes, UPX should be a package before it's used to make packages. >> >> I vote for including UPX... and Lapo makes two. Do we need a third? And >> are there any objections? >> > Does UPX come with an API library that you can just use in setup? UCL is the library which is needed to build UPX. UCL: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/ucl/ UPX: http://upx.sourceforge.net/ Gerrit -- =^..^=