Robert Collins wrote:
> > Yes, and at that point we had two issues: > 1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't > available - beyond whats in libg++-3. > 2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking. Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin package). Not having looked at Jason's code, I can't comment on the design; however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it away from STL and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right? I mean, Jason didn't go absolutely template-crazy, did he? Or am I showing my ignorance again? --Chuck
