On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:27:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:10 AM > >> > >>could someone of the gurus arround tell a (half-)guru :)) > >>what the standard way would be if packages have rebase problems? > >> > > > >We either get Jasons in-setup-rebase patch into setup, or include a > >command line rebase, and make your package require it, and your > >postinstall script execute it. > > I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was > that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of course, that > means the setup repository). The standalone rebase.exe should be built > within that project, along with setup.exe which would leverage the same > code. > > That way, there's no possibility that the two programs would get > out-of-sync with respect to the /etc/rebase.conf (?) information and > file format.
The above is correct. Unfortunately, I'm still not finished. [Jason hangs his head in shame] Sigh... Jason
