----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: Re: upset request
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:40:31PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >The following patch should move the requires: line out to be > >per-version, but it doesn't address the upset internal representation > >to allow true per-version requires. > > So... then... why offer the patch? It doesn't actually offer the > functionality that you're asking for. > > You're the one who wants it, so I don't know who you expect will benefit > from a work in progress. It means that the current setup.hint's will generate complete syntax for all versions of setup.exe. The next patch I submit will allow the fullfunctionality. I'm going to see if I can get setup.exe to 'notice' when the default version of a package has a requires: list and the test or prev versions don't, but at the moment that doesn't happen. This upset patch circumvents that issue completely. Rob
