On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:23:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > Yes, you really should be subscribed to the XFree86 mailing list if you > > are ITP'ing a package for X. However, since ghostscript was a switch > > hitter, apparently it was ok for it to get approved here. I believe > > Freeciv has an ncurses version, so I'm not real sure what the protocol > > would be on this. Should do an ITP on cygwin-xfree as well?
[snip] > If there are two binaries (and X version and a separate ncurses version) > that can each be installed independently of the other -- with perhaps a > third "common" package that each depends on -- then I'd probably > two-track it. Post to both cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree. > > Or, release it in stages: first the non-X version, thru cygwin-apps. > Then later the X- version, which should probably be discussed on both > cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree. (Yeah, ghostscript-X should've been cc:ed > to cygwin-xfree, probably). I'll go ahead and resend the Ghostscript 7.05-1 announcement to cygwin-xfree; I'm sure the XFree86 users would like to know about it too. -- Dario Alcocer -- Sr. Software Developer, Helix Digital Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.helixdigital.com
