On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:03:23AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote: >On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:23:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >> >> Nicholas Wourms wrote: >> >> > Yes, you really should be subscribed to the XFree86 mailing list if you >> > are ITP'ing a package for X. However, since ghostscript was a switch >> > hitter, apparently it was ok for it to get approved here. I believe >> > Freeciv has an ncurses version, so I'm not real sure what the protocol >> > would be on this. Should do an ITP on cygwin-xfree as well? > >[snip] > >> If there are two binaries (and X version and a separate ncurses version) >> that can each be installed independently of the other -- with perhaps a >> third "common" package that each depends on -- then I'd probably >> two-track it. Post to both cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree. >> >> Or, release it in stages: first the non-X version, thru cygwin-apps. >> Then later the X- version, which should probably be discussed on both >> cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree. (Yeah, ghostscript-X should've been cc:ed >> to cygwin-xfree, probably). > >I'll go ahead and resend the Ghostscript 7.05-1 announcement to >cygwin-xfree; I'm sure the XFree86 users would like to know about >it too.
Actually (maybe you mean this) but you probably should send it to cygwin-xfree-announce. cgf
