I've been alerted by Rick Rankin about the fact that Cygwin's
setup.ini lists the new tetex-2.0.1-1 as [prev] and the old
tetex-20020911-1 as [curr].  My personal setup.ini script got it
'right' (in this case) when I tested it (ages ago), so I didn't think
of it lateron.

Would adding a [curr] marker to tetex-2.0.1's setup.hints be enough
(or do we need epoch support in version numbering)?  How do we arrange
this?

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

Reply via email to