Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > I've been alerted by Rick Rankin about the fact that Cygwin's > setup.ini lists the new tetex-2.0.1-1 as [prev] and the old > tetex-20020911-1 as [curr]. My personal setup.ini script got it > 'right' (in this case) when I tested it (ages ago), so I didn't think > of it lateron. > > Would adding a [curr] marker to tetex-2.0.1's setup.hints be enough > (or do we need epoch support in version numbering)? How do we arrange > this?
http://cygwin.com/setup.html#setup.hint shows the correct syntax. Max.
