On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:12:21PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >I was just working on extracting the correct changelog entries for the >release notes for the upcoming setup release, when I discovered an >accidental deletion of an entry. > >OK to apply this to the 2.249 branch?
I think that ChangeLog entries about ChangeLog entries are rather redundant. Since a ChangeLog is documentation, I don't see any reason to be self-referential. cgf >Index: ChangeLog >=================================================================== >RCS file: /home/max/cvsmirror/cygwin-apps-cvs/setup/ChangeLog,v >retrieving revision 2.249.2.10 >diff -u -p -u -r2.249.2.10 ChangeLog >--- ChangeLog 7 Mar 2003 22:23:52 -0000 2.249.2.10 >+++ ChangeLog 20 Mar 2003 20:10:00 -0000 >@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ >+2003-03-20 Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >+ >+ * ChangeLog: Reinstate ChangeLog entry erroneously removed in revision >+ 2.249.2.1 . >+ > 2003-03-05 Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * netio.cc (save_dialog): Allocate an empty string if the password is >@@ -65,7 +70,12 @@ > 2002-06-05 Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Branch for a new release. >- >+ >+2002-05-26 Ralf Habacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >+ >+ * archive_tar.cc (archive_tar::next_file_name()): fixed broken >+ GNU long name extension support. >+ > 2002-05-27 Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * IniParseFindVisitor.cc (IniParseFindVisitor::visitFile): Don't
