Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:12:21PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >> I was just working on extracting the correct changelog entries for the >> release notes for the upcoming setup release, when I discovered an >> accidental deletion of an entry. >> >> OK to apply this to the 2.249 branch? > > I think that ChangeLog entries about ChangeLog entries are rather > redundant. Since a ChangeLog is documentation, I don't see any reason to > be self-referential.
I wanted to document that although the ChangeLog entry had been backed out, the code changes had not. How do you think it is best to do this? Max.
