On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> The setup-200303 branch tag has been inadvertantly moved, leaving the
> original branch untagged and inaccessible, and also giving rise to the
> insanely long version number assigned to the current setup snapshot.
>
> I've inspected the RCS files, and can restore the setup-200303 to it's
> correct location - but I will need to directly edit the RCS files.
> (Obviously I will do a test run on a local copy of the repository first).
>
> Advantages:
> * Repository would be less confusing to someone inspecting it at a later
> date.
> * We can have a less silly version number for our next release setup.
> * Simple tidyness.
>
> Disadvantages:
> * I'll need to lock the relevant directories (setup and libgetopt++) for
> about 15 minutes
>
> Comments?
> Max.
Well, as far as I'm concerned, the cleaner the repository - the better.
So, FWIW, I say go for it (if it ever gets to voting).
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
