On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a >>package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two >>months of no votes the package should fall off the list. >> > >I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is >actively tracking them. What's the harm?
An ever growing package list containing packages that no one wants. cgf
