On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a >>>>package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two >>>>months of no votes the package should fall off the list. >>>> >>> >>>I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is >>>actively tracking them. What's the harm? >> >> >>An ever growing package list containing packages that no one wants. > >And that list should be documented so that someone else doesn't try >porting it. Perhaps should be moved to a short list at the bottom, and >documented on the apps web page?
I don't mind if someone wants to try again. I just don't see any need for the list to grow without bounds. cgf
