> >AFAIC, we're ready. > >I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries: > > > >04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > >http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > >33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 > >http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 > > > >Gareth pointed to the following URLs in > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00176.html: > > > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2 > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-bin.setup.hint > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-dev.setup.hint > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/aspell-doc.setup.hint > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 > >http://www.users.on.net/gpearce/libaspell15.setup.hint > > > >Gareth says in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00179.html > >that there's no need to mark them as test, despite the fact that the gcc > >he used is still marked as such. Personally, I'd mark at least aspell-dev > >as test, seeing as that contains the files that won't work with the > current > >gcc, but it's his call (he's the maintainer, after all :) > > I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people > do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of > naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise > we have a base package which only contains source, which is also > unusual. I'd prefer to "mv aspell-{bin-,}0.50.3-1.tar.bz2" and > put it at the top level of the aspell directory and move everything else > underneath it. > > Gareth, do you have a problem with that?
I have no problem with either of the above 2 points in theory... both the rename and the marking of aspell-dev as test. (and adding dependency on aspell-en - from other email) In practice there is one niggle, the src package generates aspell-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 already - but it's the amalgam of all of the other binary packages. It produces aspell-bin. Fixing this will probably only take me a couple of minutes (when I get the time say in a couple of days) - but I don't think that it should be a show stopper for uploading the rest now. Renaming the file and changing the hint files are trivial - I'm assuming you don't need me to upload them again? If you do want me to do them then I'll do it whenever I see the reply which will be ... after I sleep probably. Regards, Gareth
