Christopher Faylor writes: > What do people think about this? I would like to be consistent in package > naming and it seems like most packages put their binaries in a package sans > -bin. There is an empty tetex package but I don't understand the need > to complicate things this way.
I just copied Debian's package layout, except that Cygwin needs the 'root' package. Tetex is built from two source packages, which complicates matters a bit. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
