> * Dean Scarff <q_fpness=omTV/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-20 16:12:14 +0800]: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >> shells: can be your login shell (http://clisp.cons.org/clash.html) > > would mean that all interpreters with a system interface (perl, > python, cint, et al) would fall into the shell category as well
Do people use perl as their login shell? if yes, then you might be right. there _are_ people who actually have CLISP as their login shell. > Sorry, but devel and interpreters should be enough for clisp imho. while the shell category is, indeed, dubious, math is not (IMO). clisp does offer quite a few features which make it a superset of bc (which _is_ in math). -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com> Warning! Dates in calendar are closer than they appear!
