Hmm... just noticed that you have libgd2 and libgd2-devel... I was under
the impression that you should stick the DLL version in the libgd
package name, which you did, but I thought that the DLL version number
was *not* included in the -devel package name.
It seems to me that the devel package should be called:
libgd-devel
Anyone care to comment on this?
Harold
- Re: [ITP] gd: A graphics library for fast image creation Lapo Luchini
- Re: [ITP] gd: A graphics library for fast image creation Harold L Hunt II
- [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics library for fast imag... Harold L Hunt II
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics library for ... Dr. Volker Zell
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics library ... Harold L Hunt II
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics libr... Dr. Volker Zell
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics ... Harold L Hunt II
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A grap... Dr. Volker Zell
- [Review 2 - Good to go] gd: A g... Harold L Hunt II
- RE: [Review 2 - Good to go] gd:... Harold L Hunt II
- RE: [Review 2 - Good to go] gd:... Gareth Pearce
- Re: [Review 2 - Good to go] gd:... Dr. Volker Zell
- Re: [Review 2 - Good to go] gd:... Nicholas Wourms
- Re: [Review 2 - Good to go] gd:... Dr. Volker Zell
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics library ... Daniel Reed
- Re: [Review 1 - No pass] gd: A graphics library for ... Nicholas Wourms
