>>>>> "Gareth" == Gareth Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm... just noticed that you have libgd2 and libgd2-devel... I was under
>> the impression that you should stick the DLL version in the libgd
>> package name, which you did, but I thought that the DLL version number
>> was *not* included in the -devel package name.
>>
>> It seems to me that the devel package should be called:
>>
>> libgd-devel
>>
>>
>> Anyone care to comment on this?
Gareth> It would be nice to say that versioned devels are never necessary, but
Gareth> unless the internals of the package are designed so as to be able to
coexist
Gareth> with future version devels (like libgd2 would be), there isn't any point
Gareth> versioning them, and hence should not be so.
I'll change it to not include the version number.
Ciao
Volker
