-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: > Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the > imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to DJB could clarify it a bit... > It works well, even has a nifty installer that installs it as a > service. The command line binaries (host, dig, rndc, etc) all play nice > under Cygwin too. I'm not really a fan of BIND's design and config > format but the win32 port works well. I see. > Of course, I'd rather see a Cygwin-based resolver + net tools. That was my idea, too. > Apparently someone convinced them > that it was indeed possible to run a resolver on localhost, and in XP > the dialog does not appear. Ahah, don't they even SELL a DNS resolver itself? 0=) - -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p o . i t w w w . l a p o . i t / http://www.megatokyo.it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkFjrAcACgkQaJiCLMjyUvvl3ACfWxcnAepsgo+B2HtmkIyBEZql Kl0AnRSTFkbNGfOr5u+wzmhYnJv0Wwp3 =cikm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
