On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brian Dessent wrote: > > Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the > > imagination. > > It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the > package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to > DJB could clarify it a bit...
It's essential to do this. A source code with no copyright or licensing information at all is highly lawless ground. Dunno about other countries but in Germany a source code is not just public domain because the author didn't add a copyright notice. On the contrary. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.