Christopher Faylor wrote: > Again, sorry but I am not really supporting genini. I > provided it as a > proof of concept when people thought they had a right to have > some sort > of way to handle the awful complexity of setup.hint files. > Since there > is nothing important relying on it, I'm comfortable leaving it as is > until somebody does it the right way.
Ok. (I just wonder how the setup.ini for the official release is created.) Anyway, I now have a genini that works for me, and I'm happy that some of my patches were useful to you. Greetings, Servaas.
