On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:31:18PM +0100, Servaas Goossens wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Again, sorry but I am not really supporting genini. I provided it as a >>proof of concept when people thought they had a right to have some sort >>of way to handle the awful complexity of setup.hint files. Since there >>is nothing important relying on it, I'm comfortable leaving it as is >>until somebody does it the right way. > >Ok. (I just wonder how the setup.ini for the official release is >created.)
Not with genini. cgf
