On Jul 25 08:35, Ken Brown wrote: > On 7/25/2013 8:15 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Hi Maintainers, > > > > > >now that the 64 bit version is in the wild, it would be incredibly cool > >if you could all have a look into building your packages, which are not > >yet available, for the 64 bit distro. > > > >Alternatively, for those of your packages which are "noarch" packages, > >for instance perl or python scripts, please drop usa note here along > >the lines of "please copy package foo from 32 to 64 bit distro". > > I don't know about python, but for perl scripts the dependencies > will almost always be different for the 64-bit distro. For example, > a dependency on perl_vendor will have to be replaced by dependencies > on various perl-* packages.
That's right, but only 13 packages have a dependecy to perl_vendor. All of them are already in the 64 bit distro, except for a single one, fvwm, and fvwm is no "noarch" package. I don't know about python either, though. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
