On Jul 31 18:23, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2013-07-25 07:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >now that the 64 bit version is in the wild, it would be incredibly cool > >if you could all have a look into building your packages, which are not > >yet available, for the 64 bit distro. > > > >Alternatively, for those of your packages which are "noarch" packages, > >for instance perl or python scripts, please drop us a note here along > >the lines of "please copy package foo from 32 to 64 bit distro". > > I just copied over the newest version of all noarch packages whose > deps are available. Ignoring obsolete packages, as of this moment, > the diffstat between the arches is +81/-316.
Cool, many thanks! How did you generate the diffstat? The numbers indicate a lot of preliminary work before running the tool since a simple diff returns numbers along the lines of -1000/+1500. So I'm wondering, do you have a list of important packages (like, say, ocaml, inetutils, any libs) still missing? It might help to get a better picture of the state of the x86_64 distro. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
