On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:02 -0400 cyg Simple wrote: > On 7/16/2018 5:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > As a compromise, we could continue to provide the client package and > > just discontinue the server package, but it's your choice. > > What use would there be even for the client? Even in my home mode > connecting to BlueHost or any other such service I need ssh to connect > to my server.
The existence of the rsh package itself does not pose a vulnerability to cygwin. People who do not need rsh package do not have to install it. Should not it leaves on users to decide whether to install or not? I think that it is better for users to have a choice. -- Takashi Yano <[email protected]>
