On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:22:09AM +0100, Michael Ring wrote: >I only removed a stupid (imho) usage of environment-variables from patch >which caused it to convert textfiles in binmounts to cr/lf files. >automode.o sounds as if it were useable for patch but right now I think >it should be kept as it is because it has prooven to work 'as is'. > >Hmm... thinking about it agauin, what about this theory: > >If I understand automode correctly a file on a textmount would be >converted to a 'unix'-style file internally and if saved in binmode >there would be no more cr/lf in the file; theory right ??? Right. cgf
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Gerrit P. Haase
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Charles Wilson
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Charles Wilson
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Earnie Boyd
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Charles Wilson
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? DJ Delorie
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Earnie Boyd
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Michael Ring
- Re: New versions of bzip2 and patch? Christopher Faylor
