For the record, I vote "yes" to the misc tools package that Chuck suggested. However, I think "texttools" is a bit too close to "textutils".
cheers, -Matt Smith > > 2) can anybody come up with a better name? This package is intended to > > be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a > > single source code file of moderate length). > > What about 'texttools'? From time to time you can add some more of > those cute little tools and some day we have a big package.
