> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:12:33AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > > >That's three! Cool! (But I still need to wait a few days in case the > > >all-powerful veto appears...) > > > > Booming voice: > > > > I am well pleased with this package. > > > > I think it should be chuckutils, though... > > Yeah, or "cygchuck"... > > Corinna
This is all well and good, but the real question remains: How much cyg could a cygchuck chuck if a cygchuck could chuck cyg? Ok, that was bad even by my low standards ;-). -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.
