On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:25:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:58:52PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: >> >>So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. >> >>I did a ls -lR >/dev/null of the cygwin source tree on my >>notebook. >> >>Baseline (current setup.exe install): 1m14.9s >>'statquery' patch I sent earlier: 4.081s >>Current CVS tree: 3.718s >>Current CVS tree w/ -E switch to mount: 3.711s >>Current CVS tree w/ -X switch to mount: 3.716s >> >>Not all that scientific, I ran each twice, took the 2nd timing. >>So, looks good, excellent work. I still don't see any >>difference on the -E or the -X tho'. > >That has got to mean that there's something wrong in the stat >logic. I didn't do anything to speed up the normal case, AFAIK, >unless you're doing this on a FAT/FAT32 partition.
Actually, even in that case, it shouldn't make that big a deal. cgf
