On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:27:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:25:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:58:52PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: >>> >>>So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. >>> >>>I did a ls -lR >/dev/null of the cygwin source tree on my >>>notebook. >>> >>>Baseline (current setup.exe install): 1m14.9s >>>'statquery' patch I sent earlier: 4.081s >>>Current CVS tree: 3.718s >>>Current CVS tree w/ -E switch to mount: 3.711s >>>Current CVS tree w/ -X switch to mount: 3.716s >>> >>>Not all that scientific, I ran each twice, took the 2nd timing. >>>So, looks good, excellent work. I still don't see any >>>difference on the -E or the -X tho'. >> >>That has got to mean that there's something wrong in the stat >>logic. I didn't do anything to speed up the normal case, AFAIK, >>unless you're doing this on a FAT/FAT32 partition. > >Actually, even in that case, it shouldn't make that big a deal.
Yep. The stat logic was screwed up. It was never reading the file. I'm rerunning a snapshot now. cgf
