On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:35:09PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >At 05:50 PM 11/13/2002 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>The above ls -l example shows the result if we don't use is_grp_member(). >>We already had a lot of problems due to this some time ago. I won't return >>to the old state. I, for one, would better like to improve is_grp_member(). > >Hello Corinna, > >Sorry, didn't respond to that paragraph in my previous e-mail. >I agree that is_grp_member () is useful and withdraw my suggestion to >eliminate it.
I have nothing useful to add here other than the fact that I am really loving this dialog. I like to see things being hashed out like this. Pierre, I really appreciate your delving into issues here. And, of course I appreciate all that Corinna has done with ntsec. I am sure that she regrets ever listening to me when I suggested that she do something with Windows permissions years ago. Not that I am trying to insert any claim to helping with ntsec. This is all a black box to me. Anyway, I think between the two of you, we'll eventually have things working as well as humanly possible on Windows. I'm happy to see you working on these issues. My 2c. cgf
