On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:35:09PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > I would say that the comparison (on your example) of the existing method > and the current patch show that the current patch better reflects the > "reality", because it only tries to do so when the actual current token > groups are known and the "reality" is well defined (*).
> (*) I just noticed that getgroups32 should read the impersonation token > if it exists. Isn't the impersonation token automatically read by OpenProcessToken() when an impersonation took place? > Thus I suggest that we use the method of the patch for now, and think > of improving is_grp_member if/as we get specific reports of problems. > What do you think? Do you mean my one liner? If so, I agree. My patch is just a starting point. Could you then please resend the parts of your #1 patch we agreed upon? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc.