On Dec 11 21:20, Christian Franke wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> Oh, btw. >> >> I was wondering if you would be not too disgusted by the idea to add >> some documentation about this change to the Cygwin User's Guide. >> There's already some blurb in pathnames.sgml about the /proc/registry >> access. Currently it lacks a description of the entire % handling. >> Maybe it would be helpful to break out an entire (small) section for the >> /proc/registry access... >> >> > > > 2008-12-11 Christian Franke <[email protected]> > > * pathnames.sgml: New section for /proc/registry. Document registry > name encoding.
Cool, thank you! Patch applied. Here's a question which occured to me when reading the doc after I had applied it. There's apparently still a problem which is, how do you read the default value of a key if a value called '@' exists? Do you have an idea for a simple solution? Thanks again, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
