On Dec 12 18:32, Christian Franke wrote: > Why not encode "@" as a reserved name like it is already done for "." and > ".." (which appear as "%2E" and "%2E.")? This would provide backward > compatibility and consistency with current conversions: > > @ - default value > %40 - named key or value > %40%val - named value if key exists > > I will post a patch.
Perfect. Thamks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
