On Mar 21 15:59, Peter Foley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 21 13:15, Peter Foley wrote: > >> When cross-compiling a toolchan targeting cygwin, building cygwin1.dll > >> requires libstdc++v3 to be built. > > > > Building cygwin1.dll doesn't require libstdc++-v3. The Cygwin DLL is > > never linked against it and never will be. Only building the utils dir > > requires libstdc++ and that would be fixed by not builing utils as in > > your other patch, wouldn't it? > > Sorry for being unclear. > Building cygwin1.dll requires the *headers* from libstdc++-v3.
Still hmm at this point. AFAICS we only need the handful of definitions for new and delete operators, nothing else. Is there perhaps a way to define this stuff by ourselves to avoid any requirement for libstdc++ headers for building the DLL? Or is that just not feasible? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
