On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Peter Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Corinna Vinschen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Still hmm at this point. AFAICS we only need the handful of definitions >> for new and delete operators, nothing else. Is there perhaps a way to >> define this stuff by ourselves to avoid any requirement for libstdc++ >> headers for building the DLL? Or is that just not feasible?
It is possible to avoid including libstdc++ headers, but since cygserver.exe links against libstdc++, we'd still need to build libstdc++, and we still have the mingw-crt headers dependency. So I'm not sure there's really any point essentially in-lining part of libstdc++'s new header so that we can build without libstdc++. Thanks, Peter
