On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:14:13AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >Ok this is a quick-and-it-couldbe-cleaner patch. > >It's interim - this weekend I'll make time to roll the logic throughout >thread.cc. The patch doesn't introduce any new issues though, and it is >the correct IMO step to solving the issue(s) I was trying to address >with my last lets-break-cygwin patch. > >I have _no_ idea why it worked at all after I built that .dll :}. The >fault for those wanting the grisly details was that I changed the >semantics of verifyableobject_isvalid without updating the tests against >the return code. Doh. > >I'm having some trouble with cvs+ssh with this patch .. though I'm not >sure why. For a little while I though it might be chris's tuesday >sleep(1) change, because I was getting strange results from pspec> I'm >not sure though.
Huh? What is my "sleep(1)" change? The only change I made on Tuesday was to fhandler_tty_common::ready_for_read. How would that affect cvs? I don't know what pspec is either, so I'm lost. cgf
