I can remove it - no problem. Have you tried building the tree without it first though ?
Alan. On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:17:29 -0500, Harold Hunt wrote: > Here is what Paul had to say. Put together with what Alan said it sounds > like __STDC__ will be coming out of StandardDefines. > > Alan, do you want to commit this directly, or would you like me to submit a > patch? > > Harold > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Stodghill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:53 PM > To: Harold Hunt > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem > > > It's been over a year, but I believe that my reasoning was as follows, > > I guess it is not technically a bug. However, the C standard (or at least > the c9x draft that I have) says that __STDC__ is a predefined implementation > specific macro. The GCC manual discusses how __STDC__ is set depending upon > the use of the -traditional flag. I don't believe that it makes sense to set > or unset __STDC__ either from the command line or using preprocessor > directives. > > Hope this helps. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:32 PM > > To: Paul Stodghill > > Cc: cygx > > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem > > > > > > I recently stumbled across a message you wrote way back in March 2001: > > http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200103/msg00082.html > > > > I notice that you say that cygwin.cf shouldn't be defining __STDC__ in > > StandardDefines. I can see that linux.cf and darwin.cf do not define > > __STDC__ in StandardDefines, but I don't know why we should > > not be defining > > it either. > > > > A quick and explanation would get this problem quickly > > remedied (I like to > > do things correctly, so I'd like to fix this problem). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Harold > > > >
