Alan, Yup. I just built it with no problems.
Harold > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Hourihane > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem > > > I can remove it - no problem. > > Have you tried building the tree without it first though ? > > Alan. > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:17:29 -0500, Harold Hunt wrote: > > Here is what Paul had to say. Put together with what Alan said > it sounds > > like __STDC__ will be coming out of StandardDefines. > > > > Alan, do you want to commit this directly, or would you like me > to submit a > > patch? > > > > Harold > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Stodghill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:53 PM > > To: Harold Hunt > > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem > > > > > > It's been over a year, but I believe that my reasoning was as follows, > > > > I guess it is not technically a bug. However, the C standard > (or at least > > the c9x draft that I have) says that __STDC__ is a predefined > implementation > > specific macro. The GCC manual discusses how __STDC__ is set > depending upon > > the use of the -traditional flag. I don't believe that it makes > sense to set > > or unset __STDC__ either from the command line or using preprocessor > > directives. > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:32 PM > > > To: Paul Stodghill > > > Cc: cygx > > > Subject: RE: Patch to fix cygwin-xfree+gcc-2.95.3+autoconf problem > > > > > > > > > I recently stumbled across a message you wrote way back in March 2001: > > > http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-patches/200103/msg00082.html > > > > > > I notice that you say that cygwin.cf shouldn't be defining __STDC__ in > > > StandardDefines. I can see that linux.cf and darwin.cf do not define > > > __STDC__ in StandardDefines, but I don't know why we should > > > not be defining > > > it either. > > > > > > A quick and explanation would get this problem quickly > > > remedied (I like to > > > do things correctly, so I'd like to fix this problem). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Harold > > > > > >
