> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:48 AM > >I didn't quite gather from the earlier discussions whether > we can have > >a source package seperate from any binary packages. i.e., could we > >have XFree86-full-src without an associated binary package? > Or would > >we have to make XFree86-base-src the package that contained the full > >source archive. > > Hmm. Yes. I think this would work. That might be the best solution. > > In fact, it may be a nice trend setter. I think setup.exe needs a little work before doing this, but it's a good direction. (i.e. setup.exe should have a view to only show src packages, and a view to only show binaries - to avoid confusing folk). (Think apt-get source vs apt-get install). Rob
- Re: cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages avai... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packag... Ian Burrell
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Cygwin/XFree86 setup.exe packages av... Teun Burgers
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packag... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe pa... Harold Hunt
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.ex... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setu... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86... Harold Hunt
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfr... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages av... Robert Collins
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages av... Robert Collins
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packag... Charles Wilson
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe pa... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages av... Robert Collins
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packag... Charles Wilson
- RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages av... Robert Collins
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packag... Charles Wilson