On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:48:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:43:14PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:03:30PM -0400, Harold L Hunt wrote: >>>Chris, Pierre, >>> >>>Oh yeah, and now ssh seems to be challenged by the 2043 EDT >>>cygwin1-20020701.dll snapshot. Output follows. (Remote host ip obscured as >>>all 0's for privacy). >>> >>>Harold >>> >>>Administrator@NUCFAC13 ~ >>>$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> 64 [main] ssh 1044 seteuid32: special case, returning 0 >>> 848623 [main] ssh 1044 seteuid32: special case, returning 0 >>> 850239 [main] ssh 1044 seteuid32: special case, returning 0 >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: >> >>Doh. system_printf != syscall_printf. I've checked in a fix >>and am rebuilding the snapshot. > >And, additionally, I put Pierre's patch in the wrong place in the code. >Sigh. I had to interpret it because the formatting was GNU standard and >I interpreted it wrong. > >This snapshot was hosed. I'm regenerating it *again*.
The new snapshot is available. cgf
