Harold Hunt wrote: >>WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this >>thread start out as "Success with Java prog in XFree"? I just assumed >>that 'xlauncher' WAS that Java prog. Sorry for the confusion. >> > > You know... sometimes I'm just not paying any attention at all. What has > happened to me?!? > > A Java xlauncher sounds fine to me, for now. I'd eventually prefer that it > be written in C or C++. > > How large are the Java runtimes for Cygwin? I'm sure we'll get complains > along the lines of, ``before I had to install 100 MB for Cygwin/XFree86, now > I have to install XX MB more for the xlauncher program, blah''. So I'm not > really excited about sticking with Java forever. > > Feeling like an idiot,
You shouldn't. You were correct originally. The xlauncher program IS written in Delphi. The first message in this thread contained the following postscript: > PS: I am working on a xlauncher based on the one made available by Tim > Thomson but for Cygwin(not only the cuted package from him). > I want to include a file text that will contains some definition > of servers to access (as IP address, OS, and so on). > I will try to make it available. Where should I send it when ready > (probably in 1 or 2 weeks) ? That launched the subthread, which was properly marked using the [was: ] construction. The problem here was *my* connection between the xlauncher subthread <---> and java. You're not the idiot -- I am. --Chuck
